For 2026, an environment of moderate growth and easing inflation is emerging. After a phase marked by stagflationary tendencies, GDP forecasts are edging up again, ranging between +1.3% and +1.7% depending on the institution. At the same time, structural risks are increasing. In the United States, interest rate cuts are being discussed, while credit markets in Europe remain tight. As a result, companies and investors are increasingly turning to alternative financing solutions, as traditional bank lending becomes more restrictive.
This trend is particularly evident in two areas: refinancing pressure in the real estate sector is rising sharply, and the number of corporate insolvencies has reached new highs. In Germany alone, 17,604 insolvencies of individuals and corporations were recorded in 2025 according to the IWH, the highest level in 20 years and even above the peak seen during the 2009 financial crisis. The data shows a normalization after years of extraordinary fiscal support during the pandemic, but it also signals more credit stress in multiple sectors.
In addition, geopolitical uncertainties and structural weaknesses in Germany’s business model are further weighing on investment decisions. In this environment, Private Debt is increasingly coming into focus and both as a source of returns and as a potential stress factor within the financial system.
1.What Is Private Debt?
Private Debt refers to lending provided by funds and institutional investors outside the traditional banking system. Research firms now estimate the global Private Debt market to be worth approximately USD 2 to 3 trillion. Estimates change based on methodology, but a lot of industry surveys confirm that private credit has doubled in size over the past decade. In this model, companies receive debt capital directly from specialized credit funds, often without public listing, without daily market pricing, and under individually negotiated terms. Especially during periods of tighter banking regulation, Private Debt has established itself as a core pillar of corporate financing.
At its core, Private Debt consists of direct loans that bypass banks and public capital markets. For investors, this makes Private Debt an alternative investment outside the banking system, offering predictable interest payments but also carrying specific and distinct risks.
Distinction from Other Financing Forms
Private Debt differs significantly from traditional investment and lending instruments:
Bank Loans
Banks are subject to strict capital requirements and regulatory constraints. Private debt funds operate with greater flexibility but also assume higher credit risk.
Bonds
Bonds are publicly listed, traded daily, and continuously marked to market. Private Debt is illiquid, rarely publicly valued, and reacts less directly to short-term market volatility.
Crowdinvesting
While crowdinvesting typically targets smaller volumes and retail investors, Private Debt primarily serves institutional investors such as insurance companies, pension funds, and family offices.
Typical Instruments in the Private Debt Market
Depending on the company’s situation and risk profile, different lending structures are used:
Senior Loans
Senior secured loans with relatively low risk, often featuring floating interest rates.
Mezzanine Financing
Subordinated debt positioned between equity and senior debt, offering higher returns but carrying increased risk.
Direct Lending
Individually structured loans to mid-sized companies, often provided without banks acting as intermediaries.
This diversity makes Private Debt attractive for investors but also reduces comparability across investments. Transparency, default rates, and manager quality play a central role in evaluating Private Debt opportunities. In contrast to public bond markets, standardized reporting frameworks are less, which makes due diligence and manager selection particularly decisive.
The Role of Institutional Investors
The Private Debt market is primarily driven by institutional investors seeking stable income streams and consciously accepting illiquidity. Insurance companies, pension funds, and large asset managers use Private Debt to achieve returns above those of traditional bonds.
As a result, Private Debt has become a core component of many institutional portfolios. At the same time, as market volumes continue to grow, the question of how resilient this asset class truly is across a full credit cycle is becoming increasingly important.
Wenn du willst, gehen wir als Nächstes logisch weiter mit
Stresstests & Ausfallrisiken, Shadow Banking & Systemrisiken, oder einem klaren Fazit für Investoren 2026.
2. What Are Shadow Banks?
Shadow banks are financial actors that perform credit-like functions outside the traditional banking system. These include, among others, credit funds, securitization vehicles, and money market funds. They provide capital and extend credit but are not subject to the same regulatory requirements as banks.
Why Are Private Debt Funds Considered Part of the Shadow Banking System?
Private debt funds are considered part of the shadow banking system due to a lot of factors: they extend credit without possessing a banking license and their operations fall outside the scope of conventional capital adequacy regulations.
In doing so, they help close financing gaps created by stricter banking regulation, while at the same time shifting credit risk into less transparent structures.
Key Differences Compared to Regulated Banks
- Lower regulatory requirements
- Limited transparency
- No direct access to central bank liquidity
- Greater dependence on market and credit cycles
Regulatory Gaps
Supervisory authorities such as the ECB and the BIS have warned for years in their own publications that the rapid growth of Private Debt can create systemic risks. Especially during periods of market stress, the risk of contagion increases when defaults rise or liquidity becomes scarce.
As a result, shadow banks represent a central yet sensitive component of credit markets in 2026.
Why Is Private Debt Under Particular Pressure in 2026?
In 2026, the Private Debt market is facing a significantly more challenging environment than in previous years. After a phase of strong growth during the low-interest-rate era, multiple pressure factors are now unfolding simultaneously. The key issue is not a single risk, but rather the combination of refinancing pressure, a maturing credit cycle, and declining transparency.
The Refinancing Wall in the Real Estate Sector
A key issue for Private Debt real estate strategies is the so-called refinancing wall. According to Morgan Stanley Research, approximately USD 1.5 trillion in global commercial real estate loans will mature by the end of 2026. Many of these financings were originated during a period of significantly lower interest rates.
Today, higher interest rates coincide with declining property valuations and weaker cash flows, particularly in office and commercial real estate. For borrowers, refinancing has become more difficult and more expensive. For private debt funds, this increases the risk of impairments, restructurings, or non-performing loans. The magnitude of this risk depends heavily on loan-to-value ratios, covenant structures, and sector exposure, particularly in office real estate.
Rising Default Risks Across the Credit Cycle
The boom in private debt funds was accompanied by strong capital inflows. In order to sustain target returns, lending standards were relaxed across many segments. Higher leverage levels, weaker covenants, and optimistic assumptions regarding repayment capacity became common features.
By 2026, it is becoming clear that this approach carries cyclical risks. In the late stage of a credit cycle, default rates in private debt typically increase, a pattern repeatedly highlighted by market observers. Officially reported default rates have so far remained moderate, but they do not capture all underlying risks. Restructurings and deferred payments can distort the picture, often delaying the visibility of actual stress within portfolios.
Payment-in-Kind as a Structural Warning Signal
Market observers view the increasing use of payment-in-kind (PIK) interest structures as particularly concerning. Under these arrangements, interest is not paid in cash on an ongoing basis but is instead capitalized and added to the loan principal. While this provides short-term relief for borrowers, it results in a higher debt burden over the long term.
The fact that PIK structures are now being used more frequently even in senior loan transactions is widely seen as a sign of growing financial stress. Such structures may improve headline metrics in the short term, but they can obscure underlying economic weaknesses and increase risk for investors, especially during periods of market stress. Credit analysts often interpret increased PIK usage as a late-cycle indicator, as it shifts liquidity pressure into the future rather than resolving it structurally.
“In summary, Private Debt in 2026 is facing its most significant stress test to date. A market that has expanded rapidly must now demonstrate how resilient it truly is under realistic credit conditions and rising default risks.”
3. Systemic Risks and Why Banks Are Affected
Although private debt and shadow banks do not operate within the traditional banking system, banks are both directly and indirectly affected by these developments. The close interconnection between credit funds and traditional financial institutions makes the system vulnerable once defaults increase or liquidity tightens.
The Multiple Roles Banks Play
- Lenders
Banks provide private debt funds with credit lines, bridge financing, or structured refinancing solutions. As default rates within funds rise, the risk on bank balance sheets increases accordingly. - Refinanciers
Some funds rely on bank financing to enhance returns through leverage. In periods of stress, this mechanism can rapidly drain liquidity. - Investors
Banks themselves invest in private debt structures or hold indirect exposures through funds, special purpose vehicles, or securitizations.
This multi-layered interconnectedness increases the risk of contagion when loans become distressed. What initially appears to be a problem within individual private debt funds can spread to the banking system through refinancing channels. In response, banks tend to tighten lending standards to limit risk.
For the real economy, this has tangible consequences. Mid-sized companies face problems with restricted access to debt capital like facing increased costs. This constraint leads to businesses delaying investments and experiencing slower growth.
In extreme cases, this dynamic can even lead to a credit crunch. Banks pull back, private debt funds become more cautious, and the financing gap widens. It is precisely this interaction that makes Private Debt in 2026 an issue that extends far beyond individual investment decisions.
4. What Opportunities Exist in the Private Debt Market in 2026?
Despite rising risks, Private Debt continues to offer opportunities in 2026 for investors who understand the structure of the asset class and apply a selective approach. What matters most is less the overall market direction and more the quality of borrowers and financing structures.
Key Opportunities at a Glance
- Attractive Nominal Returns
For senior loans, expected current yields are now around 8–8.5 percent. These returns are driven by higher base rates, floating coupons, and credit spreads, without necessarily relying on asset price appreciation. - Tailored Financing for Mid-Sized Companies
Due to stricter banking regulation, many mid-sized companies face limited access to traditional bank credit. Private debt funds fill this gap with individually structured direct loans, often offering greater planning certainty for both borrowers and lenders. - Distressed Opportunities in Real Estate
Refinancing pressure in commercial real estate is creating opportunities for investors with restructuring expertise. Distressed sales, refinancing solutions, and repricing are opening entry levels that are typically unavailable during stable market phases. - Selective Opportunities in Defensive Sectors
Companies with stable cash flows in sectors such as infrastructure, healthcare, and essential services are particularly attractive. In these segments, Private Debt can represent a comparatively resilient source of income.
5. Which Risks Are Often Underestimated by Investors?
The appeal of Private Debt is often defined by its recurring income. In doing so, risks that tend to materialize only during periods of stress are frequently overlooked. For investors in 2026, it is essential to assess these factors realistically.
Key Risk Areas at a Glance
- Illiquidity
Private debt investments are typically long-term and capital is locked in for extended periods. Early exits are often limited or only possible at a discount. During market stress, lack of liquidity can become a decisive disadvantage. - Limited Transparency
Many private debt funds disclose only limited information on borrowers, covenants, or risk concentrations. Valuations are often conducted internally rather than market-based, which can obscure underlying risks. - Valuation Risk
Valuations often lag behind the deterioration of economic conditions because of the absence of daily market prices. Consequently, value adjustments are frequently delayed until restructurings or defaults become imminent. - Dependence on Manager Quality
Performance is highly dependent on the experience and discipline of fund managers. Credit underwriting, deal structuring, and enforcement of collateral are more critical than in liquid asset classes. - Rising Correlations in Stress Periods
In calm market environments, Private Debt appears weakly correlated with equities or bonds. In periods of stress, however, these correlations often increase as liquidity and credit risks materialize simultaneously.
6. Private Debt Compared to Other Alternative Investments
Within the universe of alternative investments outside the banking system, Private Debt is often positioned as a stable middle ground. A closer comparison, however, reveals clear structural differences compared to other asset classes.
Private Debt vs. Equities
Equities are growth-driven, volatile, and highly dependent on market sentiment. Private Debt, by contrast, focuses on recurring interest income. The trade-off is the lack of daily liquidity, and losses often become visible only with a delay.
Private Debt vs. Bonds
Compared to bonds, Private Debt offers higher nominal returns but is:
- less liquid
- harder to compare
- more dependent on the credit cycle
Bonds react immediately to changes in interest rates, while Private Debt responds only indirectly.
Private Debt vs. Litigation Finance
The key difference lies in the return logic:
- Private Debt is interest- and cycle-dependent
- Litigation finance is event-driven and not market-based
As a result, the two investment strategies respond to fundamentally different risk factors.
IN JUST 5 MINUTES:
In just 5 minutes: Become a sponsor – Your entry into attractive litigation financing opportunities
1
Register as a sponsor
2
Select a case
3
Set the bid amount and quota
4
Provide PayPal or credit card details
5
Participate in the litigation proceeds
7. Why Many Portfolios Underestimate Credit Risk
Many investors focus primarily on yield figures and historical stability, while structural risks are often overlooked:
- a focus on returns rather than understanding underlying structures
- the relatively short track record of modern private debt strategies
- a lack of robust stress tests across full credit cycles
In 2026 in particular, it is becoming clear that past periods of stability are no guarantee of future resilience.
Litigation Finance as a Structural Complement
It should be noted that litigation finance carries its own risks, including case-specific uncertainty and illiquidity. Its role in portfolios depends on diversification and careful selection. Litigation finance differs fundamentally from the credit-based investments discussed above.
- Returns depend on case outcomes rather than market movements
- There is no direct exposure to interest rates or economic cycles
- Correlations with equity and credit markets are low
Within a diversified portfolio, litigation finance may serve as a complementary allocation, as its return drivers differ structurally from credit-based investments.
8. What Should Investors Consider When Investing in Private Debt in 2026?
Private Debt in 2026 continues to offer opportunities but is under real structural pressure. Refinancing risks, rising defaults, and systemic interconnections require a more nuanced assessment. For investors, the key question will be less whether to invest in Private Debt and more how selectively, how structurally, and in what combination with market-independent sources of return.
This assessment is consistent with the analysis of the Bank for International Settlements, which has repeatedly highlighted systemic risks arising from the growth of credit markets outside the regulated banking sector. In particular, the increasing interconnectedness between banks, credit funds, and the real economy is seen as a potential amplifier during periods of financial stress.
